A study presents a taphonomic-forensic analysis of the skulls from the Sima de los Huesos
The CENIEH publishes a paper cataloging the processes occurring before death (antemortem), at a time close to death (perimortem), and after death (postmortem) for the largest known collection of skulls and jaws in human paleontology, found in the Sierra de Atapuerca.
Nohemi Sala, a researcher at the Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana (CENIEH), has just published a paper in the journal The Anatomical Record, which catalogs the modifications to the largest known collection of skulls and jaws in the whole of human paleontology, found at the Sima de los Huesos site (Atapuerca, Burgos), and including processes before death (antemortem), at moments close to death (perimortem), and after death (postmortem), for about twenty individuals.
This collection consists of over 2000 fragments which have been recovered progressively every summer for more than thirty years, during the excavation campaigns in the Sierra de Atapuerca. The fragments are then fitted together like the pieces of a jigsaw.
“So far, we have 20 individuals represented by their skulls and jaws, of the 29 we estimate on the basis of the dentition. This huge number of specimens has made studying the forensic taphonomy of a fossil population possible, something that would be unthinkable outside the walls of this chamber in Burgos”, comments Sala.
Taphonomy is the paleontological discipline which analyzes fossils to find out what happened to the individuals between their death and the moment of excavation. “By looking at points such as marks and fractures in the fossils, we can decipher processes, as though we were conducting an autopsy”, explains the lead author of this study, which is part of a special journal issue dedicated to the Sima de los Huesos.
Lesions in life
A total of 57 cranial lesions with signs of healing have been documented in 20 individuals at the Sima de los Huesos, which means that these injuries definitely happened before death. These lesions of circular morphology, which affect the cranial vault in nearly all the individuals (17 of the 20 specimens), have been interpreted as blunt force traumas that caused depression of the bone in the different skull regions.
An analysis of the incidence of these blows was conducted at the population level, and it was found that they affect individuals of all ages and sexes, and so there is no specific preferential group in this fossil population. These data indicate that this group was exposed to generalized episodes leading to nonfatal impacts in the cranial region.
It was also possible to verify the presence of a new individual with perimortem cranial fractures, meaning that the injury took place at a moment close to death. This means that there are now nine individuals with evidence of cranial traumas that could have been lethal. One of the best-known cases is that of skull 17, published some years ago in the journal PLOS ONE.
Cases of violence
However, the most striking point of the analysis is that, of the nine individuals with perimortem traumas, six had penetrating fractures (circular holes of a similar size) in the left nuchal region. This pattern is so recurrent that it leaves little room for interpretation. The location is not what would be expected for accidental traumas, and is more compatible with intentional lesions, so these injuries are interpreted as possible cases of violence, just as with skull 17.
Finally, postmortem modifications were documented and it was possible to show that, following these individuals’ deaths, only alterations characteristic of cave interior environments were produced: fracturing due to sediment pressure and precipitation of minerals (calcite and oxides of iron and manganese). No marks attesting to long-distance transport of the remains inside the cavity have been documented. “We can interpret this to mean that the skeletons arrived at the cave complete, and shortly after death”, concludes Sala.
The other participants in this study, which was made possible by financing from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PGC2018-093925-B-C33 (MCI/AEI/FEDER, UE)), the European Research Council (ERC-DEATHREVOL, no. 949330) and CaixaBank-Fundación Atapuerca by means of a predoctoral grant, were the CENIEH researcher Ana Pantoja, and the researchers Ana Gracia and Juan Luis Arsuaga of the Universidad de Alcalá and the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, respectively.
Full Bibliographic Information:
Press release from CENIEH